SHENGO is a structured, AI-assisted way for governments to consult the people their policies affect. A rural expert, a regional civil society group, a citizen with a phone: each gets a verified record that their voice was part of the decision.
Logos indicate organisations in early conversation with SHENGO. They do not imply a formal partnership or endorsement.
Submitted to the Climate Resilience consultation from Adama, with no travel to the capital.
In Ethiopian traditions, the shengo is the assembly where the community deliberates, and every voice has a verified place in the decision.
We built a platform around that idea: structured deliberation, relevant stakeholders included, made digital, scalable, and accountable across the continent.
Governments still consult through workshops and email chains: costly, geographically narrow, and impossible to audit. The people with the most at stake are the easiest to leave out.

Consultations happen in Addis Ababa. A specialist three hundred kilometres away is excluded by cost and logistics, not by lack of insight.

A regional civil society group sends written input and attends workshops, but never receives proof that its voice was actually considered.

Most people have no channel at all to take part in a national consultation, even on policies that will define their daily lives.
Verbal and email submissions leave no public record of what was sent, considered or ignored.
In-person consultations are expensive, so governments consult when there is budget, not when policy needs it.
Donor safeguard frameworks require documented consultation that current processes cannot reliably produce.
Experts show up, yet contributions go unattributed and unverifiable.
Every SHENGO consultation follows the same verifiable path, from the moment a ministry opens it to the public record that closes it.
A ministry publishes a structured consultation with clear categories, a deadline and invited stakeholders.
Experts, civil society and citizens respond in structured form. Each submission is timestamped and logged.
The AI layer groups submissions by theme and position, giving officers a briefing in hours, not weeks.
Decision makers work from the synthesis alongside every raw submission, with dissent kept visible.
A public record shows who took part, what was incorporated and what was not. Compliance exports follow automatically.
SHENGO is not a survey tool. It is structured infrastructure that replaces the workshop and email model with a verifiable, scalable, AI-assisted process.
Ministries publish consultations with defined categories, deadlines and response formats. Every submission is timestamped, attributed and cryptographically logged.
Civil society, experts and citizens register through a verified identity layer. Submissions carry institutional affiliation, with an anonymous option for citizens.
Submissions are clustered by theme, stakeholder type and position. Policy officers receive a structured summary that turns weeks of reading into hours.
Each consultation produces a public record: who was invited, who submitted, what was submitted and what was incorporated. Donor safeguard reporting follows from it.
A preview of the working interface for each role. Figures shown are illustrative during the testing phase.
| Consultation | Ministry | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Climate Resilience Policy | Planning and Development | Open |
| Higher Education Reform | Education | In synthesis |
| Digital Accessibility in Services | Technology and Innovation | Open |
| Smallholder Irrigation Strategy | Agriculture | Draft |
Climate Resilience Policy. Three short structured questions, about four minutes.
Submit anonymously, and still receive a private receipt that proves your voice was counted.
Your submission was logged on the public record. You can check, at any time, whether it was reflected in the final policy.
Submissions cluster around three priorities: reliable infrastructure in regional areas, clearer regulatory guidance for service providers, and accessibility standards for citizens with disabilities. Two dissenting positions on rollout pace are flagged below and preserved in full.
| Contributor | Type | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Regional ICT Association | Civil society | Logged |
| Dr. expert (verified) | Independent expert | Cited |
| Anonymous citizen | Citizen | Logged |
Each actor needs something different. SHENGO is designed so that the whole circle benefits when consultation is done well.
SHENGO turns consultation from a compliance burden into an intelligence asset. Ministries receive structured, synthesised input from verified stakeholders, ready for decision making.
AI synthesis clusters submissions by theme and position, so officers get a briefing rather than a data dump.
Each consultation produces audit ready records for donor safeguard frameworks, removing manual reporting.
An immutable audit trail lets ministries show genuine consultation, protecting decisions from challenge.
"This is exactly the kind of homegrown digital governance infrastructure the Digital Ethiopia 2030 mandate is supposed to deliver."
SHENGO reduces a real operational risk in development programmes: undocumented or inadequate stakeholder consultation. Portfolios that require safeguard compliance can use it as their documentation layer.
The audit trail is generated through the standard consultation workflow, not as a separate reporting task.
Donors can verify that funded policy work involved genuine input, with timestamped, attributed records.
The architecture supports multi country deployment, so one engagement can cover several portfolios.
"Active portfolios carry consultation documentation requirements across many projects. A workflow that satisfies them automatically meets a real, current need."
SHENGO gives civil society something it has rarely had: a verified, public record that its policy input was received. Advocacy moves from hope to documented fact.
Export participation directly for your own reporting, instead of reconstructing it after the fact.
Regional groups submit to national consultations without travelling to the capital, on a mobile first interface.
The audit trail shows which submissions were reflected, creating a new accountability mechanism.
"We have taken part in consultations for years, but never had a verified record that our voice was actually heard. That is the structural change."
SHENGO opens consultation to people who never had access, and gives experts a reputational reason to contribute quality input rather than attend for a per diem.
Any citizen can submit to public consultations, in their language, with an anonymous option.
Expert submissions are attributed, timestamped and citable. Contributions that inform decisions are flagged.
A verified record of policy contributions builds professional standing in a way no workshop attendance can.
"The shengo principle is simple: every voice has a verified place in the decision. We are making that principle work at the scale of a country."
For a citizen, taking part should feel safe and worthwhile. Here is exactly what SHENGO does with your voice, in plain terms.
Submit with your name, or anonymously. Either way your response is recorded. Anonymous submissions are never linked back to your identity.
Once logged, your response is timestamped and cryptographically protected. It cannot be quietly edited, removed or lost from the record.
When the policy is decided, the public record shows what was incorporated. You can check whether the themes you raised were reflected.
Just a verified place in the decision.
SHENGO operates under a published Data Governance Charter. Sovereignty is handled by architecture, not by promise.
Consultation data is hosted on national infrastructure. Nothing leaves the country without explicit government authorisation.
Architecture levelEach ministry retains full ownership of its consultation data. Data is portable and exportable.
In the CharterAn independent board oversees data practices, conducts annual audits and publishes public accountability reports.
Third partyAdministrators, ministry officers, verified stakeholders and public viewers each have strictly defined permissions.
Role basedActive records, closed records and public reports each have set retention periods with secure deletion protocols.
Published scheduleSHENGO undergoes an independent annual governance audit. Results are published, with any remediation timeline.
Full transparencyEthiopia is the foundation. The continental pathway runs through existing African governance institutions, in honest, staged phases.
Federal ministries, with CAFOR as institutional anchor.
An East Africa cluster, on an ECA facilitated pathway.
Regional entry points across language groups.
An open-source replication toolkit, published at month 60.
Digital Ethiopia 2030 sets the national mandate. Agenda 2063 frames the continental vision. SHENGO is the civic infrastructure that serves both.
The national strategy names citizen centred e-governance as a core pillar. SHENGO is the structured consultation layer that makes that pillar real rather than aspirational.
Good governance and people driven development need the same foundation: a way for citizens and civil society to take part in decisions at scale. That foundation is SHENGO.
Civic technology aligned with Smart Africa and the AU digital governance agenda, owned and operated on the continent.
Strong institutions need participatory governance. Partnerships need multi stakeholder engagement infrastructure. SHENGO delivers both.
SHENGO is in its testing phase, so these are engagement models rather than fixed prices. We shape each one with the partner.
A scoped consultation programme inside one or more ministries, with onboarding and support included.
SHENGO as shared consultation infrastructure across the active portfolios in a country programme.
A replication toolkit so any AU member state can stand up its own structured consultation infrastructure.
Methodology, evidence and the documents procurement teams ask for. More will be published as the testing phase progresses.

How one structured consultation reached contributors beyond the capital, and what the public record showed at the end.
Read the case study
The clustering approach, how raw submissions stay visible, and how an academic partner audits the synthesis for bias.
Read the methodology
A single page that covers what SHENGO is, what it produces, and how it satisfies safeguard documentation requirements.
Download the one pager
"I grew up in a house and community where decisions are made collectively and earn their legitimacy. Most policy today loses that. We are putting it back, at the scale of a country."
SHENGO began with a simple observation: Ethiopia, and much of the continent, has no shared infrastructure for structured, auditable policy consultation. The knowledge exists, the people are willing, but there is no door for most of them to walk through.
We are building that door. Ethiopia first, continental by design, and rooted in a tradition of deliberation that long predates the technology.




SHENGO is built through institutional collaboration. There is a path for every kind of partner.
The capital and technical infrastructure that makes SHENGO deployable at scale.
Delivery on the ground: training staff, facilitating consultations and building local capacity.
Independent credibility: auditing the synthesis, researching outputs and publishing findings.
Co-designed consultations, joint publications and shared presentation to the wider community.
Tell us your organisation and the kind of partnership you have in mind. We respond within two working days.
Testing phase · onboarding partners now
Whether you are a ministry, a donor, a civil society organisation or a researcher, there is a way to work with SHENGO.
Explore a pilot in your ministry. We handle the technical setup, you focus on the policy.
Start a conversationUse SHENGO as consultation infrastructure across your portfolio, with evidence by default.
Request a briefingJoin the network. Verified participation records for your advocacy and publications.
Join the network